Film Photography Versus Digital Photography - The Great Debate

Ever since the introduction of the digital camera, asecret that film has an unforgiving and often
war has raged within the photography community.expensive learning curve, and recent trends show
There are those that would claim 35mm film is thethat more people prefer digital for just those
one true "professional" media, and digital its casual,reasons. After all, when shooting a big event like a
amateur counterpart. Conversely as costs go downSuper Bowl, would it be better to have the potential
and quality increases, there is an ever expandingfor thousands of shots, or just the film in the bag?
group of professional photographers who only takeSports Illustrated photographers answered that
digital pictures. So what is a consumer to think? Isquestion by shooting over 16 thousand images in
35mm still the way to go, or is it time to trade in2004's bowl, entirely in digital.
that old junker for a newer, flashier model? It is timeHowever, just as some music enthusiasts claim that
to look at each format and decide once and for alleverything sounds better on a record, there are still
which is better.photographers who think that nothing compares to a
Digital: Amateur?fresh roll of film. In fact, developing film manually and
It is true that there are many digital cameras on theprinting photos in a darkroom is for some one of the
market, and like their 35mm counterparts there is anmost rewarding photographic experiences a
endless supply of variables that can impact thephotographer can have. Sure, photos can be
images each one is capable of producing. Imagepowerfully edited using tools like Adobe Photoshop to
quality (in terms of color contrast and depth of field)remove almost any imperfection, but clicking a mouse
have always been a major concern for those takingis very different than the tactile sensations of a
digital images and is still one of the common excusesdarkroom. And of course, having someone else print
heard from the opposition. Add to this the fact thatup a roll of film can take as little as an hour.
finding a digital camera that could match the sheerAnd the Winner is...
raw data contained in a photograph on film was bothNeither! Based on the accessibility of technology and
arduous and incredibly expensive, and the 35mmthe vast educational resources devoted to the topic,
enthusiast has a fairly solid argument.there's really no defining point that wins this battle
But fortunately for the consumer, the price of anone way or the other. As with many debates, the
excellent digital camera has dropped steeply in thewinner is going to be decided based upon the needs
last few years, while the quality for the dollar hasand desires of the individual photographer. Families
increased dramatically. Canon's popular "Digital Rebel"wanting to take pictures and share their memories on
line of SLRs has given people an affordable (underthe fly often choose digital due to its instant
$1,000) entry-level camera that produces neargratification and convenience, while others like having
professional results. And since Canon isn't the onlyphoto prints to display them in a picture frame or
camera company, it's a safe bet that consumers canalbum. Thanks to powerful yet affordable innovations
look forward to even better cameras at lower pricesin digital and the classic, do-it-yourself familiarity of
in the near future.film, the choice is now directly in the hands of the
35mm: Is it Antiquated?consumer- right where it belongs.
These days why use film at all? It is certainly no