Digital Photography Vs. Film Photography

since the introduction of the digital camera, a war hascertainly no secret that film has an unforgiving and
raged within the photographer community. There areoften expensive learning curve, and recent trends
those that would claim 35mm film is the one trueshow that more people prefer digital for just those
“professional” media, and digital itsreasons. After all, when taking pictures at an event
casual, amateur counterpart. Conversely as costs golike a Super Bowl, would it better to have the
down and quality increases, there is an everpotential for thousands of pictures, or just the film
expanding group of professional photographers whoyou have with you? Sports Illustrated photographers
shoot only in digital. So what is a consumer to think?answered that question by shooting over 16
Is 35mm still the way to go, or is it time to trade upthousand images in 2004’s bowl, entirely in
for a new digital model? It’s time to breakdigital.
each format down and seal this deal, once and for all.However, just as some music enthusiasts claim that
Digital Photography: Amateur?everything sounds better on a record, there are still
It is true that there are many digital cameras on thephotographers who think that nothing compares to a
market, and like their 35mm counterparts there is anfresh roll of film. In fact, developing film manually and
endless supply of variables that can impact theprinting photos in a darkroom is one of the most
images each one is capable of producing. Imagerewarding and hands on photography experiences
quality (in terms of color contrast and depth of field)one can have. Sure, photos can be endlessly edited
have always been a major concern for those takingand re-edited using fancy tools like Adobe Photoshop,
digital images and is still one of the common excusesbut clicking a mouse is just very different than the
heard from the opposition. Add to this the fact thattactile sensations of the darkroom. And of course,
finding a digital camera that could match the sheerhaving someone else print up a roll of film only takes
raw data contained in a photograph on film was bothan hour or so.
arduous and incredibly expensive, and the 35mmAnd the Winner Is..
enthusiast has a fairly solid argument.Neither! Based on the accessibility of technology and
Fortunately for the consumer, the price of an highthe vast educational resources devoted to the topic,
quality digital camera has dropped sharply in the lastthere’s really no defining point that wins this
few years. Canon’s popular “Digitalbattle one way or the other. As with many debates,
Rebel” line of SLRs has given people anthe winner is going to be decided based upon the
affordable (under $1,000) entry-level camera thatneeds and desires of the individual photographer.
produces near professional results. And since CanonFamilies wanting to take pictures and share their
isn’t the only camera company in the world,memories on the fly often choose digital due to its
it’s a safe bet consumers can look forwardinstant gratification and convenience, while others like
to even better cameras at even lower prices ashaving photo prints to display them in a picture frame
manufacturers double their efforts to be first in lineor album. Thanks to powerful yet affordable
at the retail counter.innovations in digital and the classic, "do it yourself
35mm: Is it Antiquated?familiarity of film" the choice is now directly in the
In these modern times, why even use film at all? It'shands of the consumer- right where it belongs.