Welcome to your ultimate assistive technology resource


telemate.org keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

c_media ac97 audio device c-media ac97 audio
c-media-ac97-audio driver this device cannot start
C-MEDIA AC97 AUDIO DEVICE ac97 audio device
ac97 driver C Media Ac 97 Drivers
ac 97 sound ac97
c-media ac97 audio device C Media AC97 Audio Device
c media a 97 audio driver c-media ac97 audio driver
C-Media AC97 Audio Device c-media ac97 device cannot start
unimodem half-duplex audio device unimodem half-duplex audio drivers
audio device driver c_media AC97 audio device
driver c-Media AC97 real-tech 97 driver
pci communication device C Media Ac97 Audio Device
c media ac 97 sound device ac97
c-media ac 97 drivers c-media code 10
Ac97 Audio Device Drivers c-media ac'97 audio device
DRIVER C-Media AC97 Audio Device c-media drivers

The Dichotomy of Systems Development Management

"A Systems Development Manager speaks with aThe reality is that we will always need a
forked  tongue."variety of tools that address different
aspects of the development process. And
- Bryce's LawINTRODUCTIONIn order to be aunderstand this, in software alone, there are
Systems Development Manager, you have to be ahundreds of ways to skin a cat; thanks to
lot of things: front man, educator, mentor,different programming languages, design and
sage, politician, etc. Oh yea, somethingdata  base  techniques,
else, you also have to be a hypocrite. In
order for you to survive in today's corporateetc. As much as we hate to admit it,
world you have to say one thing to yoursystems development can be a lengthy process
superiors and staff, but then do somethingand anytime we try to short stroke it with
entirely different in practice. Let me givethe latest tool du jour, we only cause
you some examples:* On the one hand,headaches later on. You cannot keep applying
managers know it is important to do theBand-Aids when major surgery is required.On
upfront work in systems design, e.g., currentthe other hand, there is the
systems analysis, information requirementsmanagement-oriented approach. This requires
definition, establish the proper systemsstructure, discipline, and responsibility;
architecture, etc., but on the other hand,three ugly words in today's systems
they encourage their staff to rush to codingdevelopment landscape. But before we tackle
without first thinking the problem through.anything of substance, it is essential that
This is because programming is a much moresuch an environment be created. Can you
tangible task than systems analysis, thusimagine designing a bridge or a building
providing demonstrative evidence to thewithout such disciplines in place? Hardly.
end-user that the project is progressing.Why should systems be any different? What is
Managers rationalize this by claiming theyneeded is the establishment of a professional
work in a pressure cooker and, as such, "Weattitude among the staff; whereby a system is
don't have time to do it right."* On the oneviewed as a product that can be engineered
hand, managers claim they wantand manufactured like any other product.
standardization in their work effort (to getOnce we have the proper perspective, we can
everyone communicating and working on aorganize the staff accordingly and create a
common level), but on the other hand,concerted development effort. True, we will
standards are thrown out the window theuse pertinent tools in the development
moment push comes to shove.* On the oneprocess, but we have to recognize that tools
hand, managers want interchangeable workerswill come and go, and are dynamically
who can easily pick up where another workerapplied. It is the process of building
leaves off, but on the other hand, they aresystems that should be regarded as a
unwilling to train the workers to a uniformprecursor to the application of tools, our
and consistent skill level.* On the onemethodologies. Only when we can reshape our
hand, managers understand the virtues ofhomogeneous development environment into a
sharing and reusing information resources,homogeneous environment will we be able to
e.g., integrate systems and eliminateact as true professionals. Unfortunately,
duplication, but on the other hand, nothis requires some management fortitude,
mechanism is implemented to check forsomething that is in short supply these days.
redundancy. Consequently, systems lackA lot of people, throw up their hands and
integration, data integrity is questionablesay this is not possible due to the
at best, and systems are routinely rewrittenmanagement realities of today and resign
over and over again, representing redundantthemselves to doing small insignificant
work effort.* On the one hand, managers knowapplications, hence the dichotomy mentioned
their systems and software should be properlyearlier.But let's consider what we have done
documented in order to expedite maintenanceover the last thirty years. We have tried
and future modifications/improvements, but onCASE tools, 4GL's, program generators,
the other hand, documentation is one of theprototyping aids, report writers, BPR tools,
first things sacrificed when a project isDBMS packages, programmer workbenches, etc.
delayed. It is assumed the system will beTrue, we have some great application
documented afterwards; unfortunately, itdevelopment tools, but if they are so good
never is. Instead of documentation beingwhy are we still experiencing problems? The
viewed as a vital working tool and aanswer is obvious; we have abdicated
byproduct of design, it is viewed as anmanagement control over our systems
inconsequential and burdensome task.* On thedevelopment environment.Now is the time for
one hand, managers claim they all wantsystems development managers to stand up for
quality workmanship, but on the other hand,their departments, their profession, and
they are unwilling to impose the requiredthemselves, and act like managers. All of
discipline, organization, and accountabilitythe things you claim to want and support are
to implement a quality environment.* On thewithin your grasp, as long as you start
one hand, managers promise to implementbehaving more like a manager as opposed to a
projects on time and within budget, but onpawn for the latest programming gizmo. Face
the other hand, this seldom occurs as projectit, you have been seduced and abandoned by
management is superficially implemented inyour tool vendors. You can talk the talk,
their organizations.* On the one hand,but can you really walk the
managers want their systems to be portable,walk?CONCLUSIONManaging a systems development
thereby making them independent of theirenvironment requires someone skilled in the
machine environment, but on the other handfundamentals of management, is not
they fall prey to the latest technicalintimidated by technology, and has a more
promise and develop systems tailored to aglobal view of systems. Some of the best
particular physical device.THE "PILL"systems development managers I have met over
APPROACHObviously you cannot have it boththe years were people who didn't have a
ways. You must take a position and implementcomputer background, but, instead, came from
accordingly. Basically, there are twoa user area and were not intimidated by the
alternatives: a tool-oriented approach or alatest technical gobbledygook. They were
management-oriented approach. On thepragmatists who were results oriented and
surface, the tool-oriented approach appearsimplemented a management environment where
to be the least painful as it doesn't requiredevelopment terminology and concepts were
any political maneuvering or managementstandardized and consistently applied.
chutzpah. I refer to this as the "pill"Frankly, some of the best candidates for the
approach for problem solving. Let meposition of systems development manager, are
explain. Years ago, comedian George Carlinthe sharpest critics of the department.
talked about how America's drug culture cameCompanies then said, "Okay, put up or
about. It was his contention that we areshut."Unfortunately, most of today's
taught to pop a pill at an early age such asdevelopment managers are the antithesis of
with children's vitamins. As we get older,what I have just described. If the choice is
it thereby becomes natural for us to pop abetween quality and speed, they will always
pill for whatever woes we experience. It maytake speed. The point is, you can have both
not be the right treatment, but we believewithout sacrificing either, it just requires
it is the most expeditious approach forsome proficiency in management.All systems
satisfying our problem. Ask any doctor, anddevelopment managers know what the cure is,
they'll tell you placebos can work wonders inthey are just not willing to take it. But
certain situations, but they also know theyunderstand this, you cannot have your cake
have limitations and are no substitutes forand eat it too.Tim Bryce is the Managing
suitable medical treatment.This "pill"Director of M. Bryce & Associates (MBA) of
phenomenon is no different than purchasing aPalm Harbor, Florida, a management consulting
new development tool that claims to solve allfirm specializing in Information Resource
of your problems. You know what? There isManagement (IRM). Mr. Bryce has over 30
no such tool. It doesn't exist, it is a mythyears of experience in the field. He is
that rates up there with the Easter Bunny andavailable for training and consulting on an
the Tooth Fairy. Nor will it ever exist.international basis.



1 A B C D 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 97 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114