The Invisible Ether and Michelson Morley

The concept of the invisible ether or 'aether' is an oldthe aether in its many different abstractions.
concept dating to the time of the ancient Greeks.However the most important of these was
They considered the ether as that medium whichconducted by american scientists Michelson and
permeated all of the universe and even believed theMorley. Their experiment considered another alleged
ether to be another element. Along with Earth, Wind,effect of a different aether theory which came to
Fire and Water Aristotle proposed that the etherbe known as the aether wind. Since the aether
should be treated as the fifth element orpermeated the entire universe, the earth would
quintessence; this term which literally means 'fifthmove within the ether as it spun on its axis and
element' has even survived down to the present daymoved within the solar system about the sun. This
to explain an exotic form of 'dark energy' which ismovement of the earth with respect to the aether
crucial in some cosmological models. These ideasgave rise rise to the idea that it would be possible to
spread throughout the world until the advent of adetect an 'ether wind' which would be sensed
new springtime in scientific thought. The first personbecause of the aforementioned movement. Thus,
in the modern era to conceive of the idea of antheir experiment was essentially an attempt to
underlying ether to support the movement of lightdetect the so-called ether wind. This mysterious
waves was seventeenth century dutch scientistzephyr would be nearly impossible to detect because
Christiaan Huygens.Many others followed inthe aether only infinitesimally affected the
expressing their opinions on the ether concept. Whilstsurrounding material world. Michelson first
Isaac Newton disagreed with Huygens wave theoryexperimented in 1881 with a primitive version of his
he also wrote about the 'aethereal medium' althoughinterferometer; a mechanism designed to measure
he expressed his consternation in not knowing whatthe wave like properties of light. He would follow this
the aether was. Newton later renounced the etherby combining forces with Morley in the most famous
theory because in his mind the infinite stationary'null' experiment of physics.In this investigation,
ether would interrupt the motions of the enormousMichelson utilized an improved version of his
masses (the stars and planets) as they moved ininterferometer device. Michelson's apparatus would
space. This rejection was reinforced by some otherhelp him win the Nobel prize for his optical precision
problematical wave properties which were notinstruments and the investigations carried out with
explicable at the time; most notably, the productionthem. His most important study being what became
of a double image when light passes through certainknown as the Michelson Morley experiment of 1887.
translucent materials. This property of matter knownMichelson and Morley used a beam splitter made of a
as 'birefringence' was an important hurdle to bepartially transparent mirror and two other mirrors
overcome for a proper understanding of the wavearranged horizontally and vertically from a light source.
nature of light.Some time later (1720) whilst workingWhen a beam of light traveled from a source of
on other astronomical issues related to light and thecoherent light to the half-silvered mirror (the
cosmos, English scientist James Bradley madesemitransparent mirror) it is transmitted to either of
observations in hopes of quantifying a parallax. Thisthe horizontal or vertical mirrors. When the light
effect is an apparent motion of foreground objectsreturned to the eyepiece of an observer the
in comparison to those in the background. Whilst heseparately returning light waves would combine
was unable to discern this parallax effect hedestructively or constructively. This phenomenon is
happened to reveal another effect which is prevalentknown as the interference effect for light. It was
in cosmological observations; this other effect ishoped that a shifting of the interference fringes from
known as stellar aberration. Bradley was able to easilythat which was normally predicted would be able to
describe this aberration in terms of Newton's particleascertain the existence of the aether wind.To detect
theory of light. However, to do so in light of thethis effect, the Michelson interferometer was
wave or undulatory theory was difficult at best sinceprepared in such a manner as to minimize any and all
to do so would have required a 'motionless' medium;extraneous sources of experimental error. It was
the static nature of this ether concept was oflocated in a lower level of a stone edifice to eliminate
course the property which had originally causedheat and oscillatory effects which might comprise the
Newton's denial of the idea.But Newton's acolytesexperimental results. Additionally, the interferometer
would find themselves in a difficult position when itwas mounted atop a marble slab that was floated in
was shown that birefringence could be explaineda basin of mercury. This was so that the apparatus
through another interpretation of the nature of light.could be moved through a variety of positions with
If light was treated as being in a side to side actionrespect to the invisible ether. But despite their many
or 'transverse motion' then birefringence could bepreparations the experiment did not yield the
attributed to a light wave rather than the particle orexpected fringe patterns. Thus, Michelson and Morley
corpuscular theory of Newton. This along with theconcluded that there was no evidence for the
detection of an interference effect for light byexistence of the ether. Others would replicate the
Thomas Young in 1801 renewed the ascendancy ofexperiment in different incarnations which modified
the wave theory of light. These findings howeverthe premise of the experiment. Each and every one
carried with them all of the preconceived notionsreturning a similar negative result. Modern theorists
prevalent in the scientific mind. Since it was assumedhave taken these results and those of many other
that waves like water and sound waves required aexperiments as being indicative of the non-existence
medium of propagation, it was similarly assumed thatof the aether. However, even the negative result of
light still needed a medium or ether for its waves toMichelson Morley has come in to question as far back
be transmitted across the universe.However, furtheras 1933.In that year, Dayton Miller demonstrated the
problems would afflict the ether theory. Because offact that even though the duo's experiment had not
the unique properties of a transverse wave itspecifically found the expected range of interference
became apparent that this hypothetical explanationpatterns, they had found an interesting little noticed
required the ether to be a solid. In response, Cauchy,effect. Miller then went on to suggest that Michelson
Green and Stokes contributed theoretical andMorley had found an experimental sine wave like set
mathematical observations to an 'entrainment'of data that correlated well with the predicted
hypothesis which later came to be known as thepattern of data. He also described how thermal and
'ether drag' concept. But nothing would give moredirectional assumptions inherent in the experimental
impetus to these ideas than when James Clerkarrangement may have impacted badly on the fringe
Maxwell's equations (1870s) required the constancyinterference data. Thus, the test may have been
of the speed of light (c). When the implications ofperformed in an imperfectly conceived experimental
Maxwell's equations are worked out by physicists, itsetup and with a built in mathematical bias against the
was understood that as a result of the need for adetection of an appropriate outcome. Thus, in the
constant speed of light only one reference framefuture the aether theory in some form or another
could meet this requirement under the teachings ofmay still be sustainable as a foundational theory of
Galilean Newtonian relativity. Therefore, scientistsphysics.Perhaps it is best to leave with these ideas as
expected that there existed a unique absoluteexpressed in 1920 by Einstein who stated that he
reference frame which would comply with this need;believed the ether theory to still be relevant to his
as a result, the ether would again be stationary.As aideas on space and time:"More careful reflection
consequence, by the late nineteenth century theteaches us, however, that the special theory of
aether was assumed to be an immovable rigidrelativity does not compel us to deny ether. We may
medium. However, earlier previous theories existed asassume the existence of an ether"he
to the nature of the aether. One of the mostcontinued:"Recapitulating, we may say that according
famous of these is known as the 'aether drag'to the general theory of relativity space is endowed
hypothesis. In this concept, the aether is a specialwith physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there
environment within which light moves. Also, thisexists an ether"and finally:"According to the general
aether would be connected to all material objectstheory of relativity space without ether is
and would move along with them. Measuring theunthinkable; for in such space there not only would
speed of light in such a system would render abe no propagation of light, but also no possibility of
constant velocity for light no matter where oneexistence for standards of space and time
tested for light's speed. This 'aether drag' idea(measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any
originated in the aftermath of Francois Arago'sspace-time intervals in the physical sense. But this
experiment which appeared to show the constancyether may not be thought of as endowed with the
of the speed of light. Arago believed that refractivequality characteristic of ponderable media, as
indexes would change when measured at differentconsisting of parts which may be tracked through
times of the day or year as a result of stellar andtime. The idea of motion may not be applied to
earthly motion. In spite of his efforts, he did notit."Michael Strauss is an engineer and author of
notice any change in the refractive indexes soRequiem for Relativity the Collapse of Special
measured.Many other experiments would follow;Relativity, a serious critique on the fallacies of Special
these were performed in order to find evidence ofRelativity.